Re: testing for a remote file to include file on a Windows mapped drive

[Stefan Monnier]

>> >> That's what ffap-rfs-regexp tries to do.  And yes, I think it 
>> >> should be added to file-remote-p.
>> 
>> > It sounds like we violently agree.
>> 
>> Then send a patch,

> It's not clear to me what should be in the patch. I was saying that we seem to
> agree that file-remote-p should deal with more than it does now. I would like 
> it
> to handle the stuff that is in the code I sent, though it need not do it the
> same way. I think it makes sense to add both ffap regexps, before the current
> file-remote-p code.

> I guess I'm saying that I think we generally agree, but it's not clear to me
> what you want in the patch.

ffap-rfs-regexp is a good first step.  But try something, and I'll tell
you what I like and what I don't.


        Stefan