[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Carbon port and multi-tty
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Carbon port and multi-tty |
Date: |
Wed, 07 May 2008 12:51:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 12:05:03 +0200
>>
>> If they don't care enough, why should I when I am not even affected?
>
> Because you want to be better then they are?
I have a better chance for that on my home turf. Because there I have a
good notion about what is important and what not, and I _see_ the
results of my work every day and can estimate its quality.
As an example: I seem to remember that you gave the MSDOS port a
text-mode CUA-like menu behavior and look, whereas this does not hold
true for text-mode on other operating systems (where tmm-mode is almost
universally despised).
I am not even sure there is any remaining user of MSDOS Emacs. So how
does it make you a better person if you focus on supporting something
which nobody seems to care about, anyway? Then this "better" is
basically just making a statement about your skills, but not its
beneficial effect on others.
I am not in a position to direct your efforts elsewhere, and indeed I
use text mode rarely enough nowadays that it would make much of a
difference for myself. There are users that still prefer text
terminals, though. But then the MSDOS code presumably is there, and if
somebody was _really_ agitated about it, he could attempt a port. It
may be a wart, but it is not like it is a fresh one...
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, (continued)
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, David Kastrup, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, David Kastrup, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, David Kastrup, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, David Kastrup, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/08
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, David Kastrup, 2008/05/08
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/08
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, David Kastrup, 2008/05/08
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/08
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/09
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/05/07
- Re: Carbon port and multi-tty, David Kastrup, 2008/05/07