|
From: | Jason Rumney |
Subject: | Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge |
Date: | Fri, 16 May 2008 13:55:17 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Kenichi Handa wrote:
I did the experiment of changing all files containing a Japanese character that are not byte-compiled to utf-8, but the resulting size is not different. That means that my guess above is not correct. :-(
How big are the data structures holding all the unicode character info and translation tables for encodings? At one point you said you wanted to make the unicode tables be loaded on demand but AFAIK they are currently dumped into the emacs executable. Could that account for a large proportion of the size increase?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |