[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proced.el

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: proced.el
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 14:57:01 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)

>> Then someone else could reimplement them in
>> a portable fashion.
>> I tend to think it is better to leave this unportable code in Lisp
>> than to move it to C, because I think the amount of unportable
>> code in C would be much much more.

> Now I have a challenge in hand to prove that you are wrong.

Obviously I can't decide what you work on, but let's not forget that we
lived happily without proced at all (not even some simpler replacement),
so I think there are more important things on which to work.  How 'bout
fixing some of the bugs at http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/emacs ?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]