[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??
From: |
Don Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:14:17 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:33:12 -0800
> > From: Don Armstrong <address@hidden>
> >
> > On Sun, 01 Feb 2009, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > All I care about is that sentence asking not to submit more bug
> > > reports. Can we please remove or rephrase that?
> >
> > It just needs someone to tell me what address they want as the
> > maintainer for the rmail package; I don't care what address it is.
>
> Please use address@hidden
Done.
Don Armstrong
--
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle
is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to
fool.
-- Richard Feynman "What is and What Should be the Role of Scientific
Culture in Modern Society"; 1964
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Jason Rumney, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??,
Don Armstrong <=
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/02