[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recognize mbox files?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Recognize mbox files? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:18:44 +0200 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:51:51 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Richard M Stallman writes:
>
> > I normally use *.xmail for these files.
> > I think others use *.mbox.
> > But the general idea would work.
>
> As long as Rmail munges the file without asking
It just adds one or two X-SOMETHING headers, that's all.
(I'm not saying that I'm in favor of autodetection, but "munges" is
greatly exaggerated, IMO.)
> Otherwise, Rmail will have to be considered risky for use by mail
> admins.
Heh, what it does nowadays is nothing compared with what it did before
the mbox merge: it would convert the file to Babyl! How's that for
``risky''?
- Re: Recognize mbox files?, (continued)
Re: Recognize mbox files?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/02/09
- Re: Recognize mbox files?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/09
- Re: Recognize mbox files?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/10
- Re: Recognize mbox files?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/02/10
- Re: Recognize mbox files?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Recognize mbox files?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/11
- Re: Recognize mbox files?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/11
- Re: Recognize mbox files?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/12
Re: Recognize mbox files?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/02/11
Re: Recognize mbox files?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/11
Re: Recognize mbox files?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/02/10
Re: Recognize mbox files?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2009/02/12
Re: Recognize mbox files?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2009/02/12
Re: Recognize mbox files?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2009/02/13