[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rmail-toggle-header problem

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: rmail-toggle-header problem
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:29:04 +0200

> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:35:18 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> In article <address@hidden>, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'm not sure that yanking from the full headers makes a lot of sense,
> > though. Eg it includes the X-RMAIL headers in the yank. Would you ever
> > want to include the full headers (all the Received: etc) in a reply?
> The reason of toggling is just to see the full headers.  I
> don't intend to yank the full headers when I type r to
> reply, and type C-c C-y to yank.

But the original pre-mbox Rmail would always yank the full headers
when you did that after expanding the headers with
rmail-toggle-header.  And I find that very convenient, because
sometimes I do need to cite all the headers of a message.  An
important case in point is when I'm talking to some sysadmin about a
problem in mail transport and want to show them a message as evidence.

> If I really want to put the original full
> headers in the reply mail, I'll copy them from RMAIL buffer.

This goes both ways: you could as easily delete them after they are

> I don't mind how the problem is fixed, but with your patch,
> I get the error "Marker does not point anywhere" when I type
> C-c C-y.

Obviously, the bug should be fixed, but please do not kill the feature
whereby C-c C-y copies the full headers.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]