[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: paths are sensative to double separators
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: paths are sensative to double separators |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:54:12 +0900 |
Harald Hanche-Olsen <address@hidden> writes:
> Miles Bader gave a different explanation for emacs's behaviour. It
> seems odd to me that an interactive feature (a good one, too) should
> influence how path names are interpreted in code, however.
I agree with you, but I'm not sure that it's reasonable to change it
now, given how long Emacs has behaved this way...
-Miles
--
x
y
Z!
- paths are sensative to double separators, Mike Mattie, 2009/03/18
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, xah lee, 2009/03/18
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/03/19
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Sebastian Rose, 2009/03/19
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Giorgos Keramidas, 2009/03/19
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/03/19
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Giorgos Keramidas, 2009/03/19
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/03/20
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/20
- Re: paths are sensative to double separators, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/03/20