Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends

[Rob Weir]

On 23 Jun 2009, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> When opening any version controlled file that is under one of the more
> modern VCs, SCCS is tried first.  Given that it's not a popular
> system, this is pure overhead, so it would be better move it at the
> end of vc-handled-backends.  Any objection to this change:
>
> --- vc-hooks.el  23 Jun 2009 06:35:43 -0000     1.278
> +++ vc-hooks.el  23 Jun 2009 06:39:31 -0000
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ interpreted as hostnames."
> :type 'regexp
> :group 'vc)
>
> -(defcustom vc-handled-backends '(RCS CVS SVN SCCS Bzr Git Hg Mtn Arch) 
> +(defcustom vc-handled-backends '(RCS CVS SVN Bzr Git Hg Mtn SCCS Arch)
> ;; RCS, CVS, SVN and SCCS come first because they are per-dir
> ;; rather than per-tree.  RCS comes first because of the multibackend
> ;; support intended to use RCS for local commits (with a remote CVS server).

Perhaps update the comment, too (by elaborating or just removing the
reference to SCCS coming first)?

-- 
-rob