[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Symbol's function definition is void: <

From: Lennart Borgman
Subject: Re: Symbol's function definition is void: <
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:11:25 +0200

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Stefan
Monnier<address@hidden> wrote:
>> I have got a strange bug report for nXhtml. The report says that < is
>> not defined. Please see
>>     http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/NxhtmlMode#toc13
>> What functions could make < void? fset?
> It might also just be an uninterned symbol, so it has the same name as
> the "strictly greater" but doesn't have any function associated with it.

Thanks. What do we need to do to catch that possibility? I suggested a
defadvice on fmakunbound (which the user reporting the problem now is
using). Maybe defadvice on make-symbol and unintern could catch this
possibility? Some more function to watch?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]