[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bzr switch
From: |
Daniel Clemente |
Subject: |
Re: Bzr switch |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:09:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
El dt, jun 30 2009 a les 04:05, Robert Collins va escriure:
> Secondly, much of the performance improvements are obtained by using a
> better representation for the hash that contains versioned file data in
> a revision; 1.9 is _massively_ slower than 2a, and doing the conversion
> is inordinately time consuming (even though its simple to do, its
> hampered by having poor source format performance).
>
> 2a is approximately 1/3 the size on disk for most projects, which also
> adds to performance, by requiring less data transfer, less cache
> footprint etc.
>
This post has benchmarks and gives very good results for 2a, even for
OpenOffice.org (260K revisions).
http://bazaarvcs.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/scability-benchmarking/
Quote from there:
,----
| In a nutshell, 2a with the latest bzr.dev is looking pretty good:
| * status, diff and commit typically take a second or two
| * recent history commands take 0.2 seconds
| * full history log takes around a minute
`----
- Re: Bzr switch, (continued)
- Re: Bzr switch, Daniel Clemente, 2009/06/28
- Re: Bzr switch, Daniel Clemente, 2009/06/28
- Re: Bzr switch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/28
- Re: Bzr switch, Karl Fogel, 2009/06/28
- Re: Bzr switch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/28
- Re: Bzr switch, Karl Fogel, 2009/06/28
- Re: Bzr switch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/29
- Re: Bzr switch, Miles Bader, 2009/06/29
- Re: Bzr switch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/29
Re: Bzr switch, Robert Collins, 2009/06/29
- Re: Bzr switch,
Daniel Clemente <=