[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sending attachments
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Sending attachments |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:14:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
> Why not? More specifically, what do you think would break if we did
> something along the lines of:
> (define-obsolete-function-alias 'mail-mode 'message-mode)
> I may need to maintain Emacs again; past history shows other
> maintainers come and go. If that happens, I want to have Mail mode,
> not depend on something that is part of Gnus.
Please explain why you consider "part of Gnus" to be a negative attribute.
> I am considering moving some code (including mml) outside Gnus so that
> Gnus will not be an issue for its future maintenance. (I've done that
> to other packages before.)
As I said, making message-mode (and related libraries) more generic
is good. I fully support it, and I think the Gnus maintainers would
not oppose it either.
Stefan
- Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/01
- Re: Sending attachments, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/01
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/04
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/06
- Re: Sending attachments, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/11
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/12
- Re: Sending attachments,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/14
- Re: Sending attachments, Leo, 2009/07/14
- Re: Sending attachments, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/14
- Re: Sending attachments, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/07/15
- Re: Sending attachments, Frank Schmitt, 2009/07/15
- Re: Sending attachments, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/16
- Re: Sending attachments, Jason Rumney, 2009/07/16
- Re: Sending attachments, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/07/16
- Re: Sending attachments, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/15
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/16