[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New bug tracker server

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: New bug tracker server
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:41:08 +0900

Chong Yidong writes:

 > > Indeed, in that case the destination info in the "Received" header is
 > > probably missing.

 > When you send to address@hidden and BCC address@hidden, the headers
 > get stripped out:

 >   Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
 >      (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
 >      id 1ND1u3-0004qm-49; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:22:23 -0500

Probably what is happening is that the message is being forwarded from
the fencepost MTA to *both* @debbugs addresses in *one* SMTP
transaction.  Since there's a BCC, you don't want "for <the BCC'd
address>" in the headers that find their way to the other addressees.
Another possibility is that in a multiple addressee transaction, the
MTA doesn't put a list in "for", it ignores it.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]