[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs

From: Karl Fogel
Subject: Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:19:19 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> That's true.  Nonetheless, allowing GPLv2 and not GPLv3 is a very bad
> example.  We should not set a bad licensing example.
> In addition, I wonder about the other pages in that wiki have a
> similar license.  Are there programs in the wiki which are licensed
> this way, allowing GPLv2 and not GPLv3?
> That would be a bad problem.  Can someone tell me if there are any?
> Can someone please send me the email address of the people who run
> that site?

Les Harris already sent that name and email address.  Here it is again:

  Alex Schroeder <address@hidden>

More information about him can be found at


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]