[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reversion revulsion [was: log format for vc-bzr]
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: reversion revulsion [was: log format for vc-bzr] |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:53:40 +0100 |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:09, Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> wrote:
> That's just from a correctness pov. I dread the performance
> implications of having to do (and possibly screwing up):
>
> cd .../trunk # 0
> bzr update # 1
> bzr merge ../quickfixes # 2
> bzr commit # 3
> bzr revert --forget-merges # 4
>
> IIUC step 3 publishes, as does step 4, defeating atomicity.
What would #4 do?
Juanma
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/01/07
- Re: reversion revulsion [was: log format for vc-bzr], Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/08
- Re: reversion revulsion [was: log format for vc-bzr], Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/08
- Re: reversion revulsion, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/08
- Re: reversion revulsion, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/08
- Re: reversion revulsion, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/08
- Re: reversion revulsion [was: log format for vc-bzr], Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/08
- Re: reversion revulsion [was: log format for vc-bzr], Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/08