[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: might a bug in ido-mode
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: might a bug in ido-mode |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:24:50 +0300 |
> From: zwz <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:27:24 +0800
>
> and then I tried the step 3 and 4 many times with various file names
> (e.g. main.c, test.c, etc.). Here the most important thing is that you
> should try to hit C-j when the ido-mode is searching. The timing is the
> key to catch the bug.
I didn't succeed in doing that, ido is too fast on my machine.
> the gdb console says:
> gdb: unknown target exception 0xc0000029 at 0x77d10754
> program received signal ?, unknown signal.
What version of GDB is that? what does "gdb --version" display?
> [switch to thread 5860.0xa80]
> 0x77d10754 in ntdll!EtwpNotificationThread()
> from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
> (gdb) warning: Invalid parameter passed to C runtime function. (9 times)
>
> And after I input "c" to continue the program, emacs crashes, with
> the gdb console saying:
> program exited with code 030000000051
Instead of typing "c", type "bt" and show the results. Please do that
in all of the 4 threads you have, like this:
(gdb) thread 1
(gdb) bt
(gdb) thread 2
(gdb) bt
etc.
Thanks.
- might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/25
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/25
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/26
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Andreas Schwab, 2010/04/26
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/27
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/27
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/28
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/28
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/29
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/27
Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/04/25