[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: might a bug in ido-mode
From: |
zwz |
Subject: |
Re: might a bug in ido-mode |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:23:08 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: zwz <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:21:29 +0800
>>
>> Thread 1 (thread 4136.0xea8):
>> #0 0x77cf5e74 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource ()
>> from C:\windows\system32\ntddl.dll
>> #1 0x764a6fd1 in USER32!SetMenuContextHelpId ()
>> from C:\windows\system32\user32.dll
>> #2 0x0116e2fe in set_frame_menubar ()
>> #3 0x010178ef in update_menu_bar ()
>> #4 0x0102ad6a in prepare_menu_bars ()
>> #5 0x0102ed02 in redisplay_internal ()
>> #6 0x01061d66 in read_char ()
>> #7 0x01063334 in read_key_sequence.clone.0 ()
>> #8 0x01065bd0 in command_loop_1 ()
>> #9 0x0100a592 in internal_condition_case ()
>> #10 0x0105bebf in command_loop_2 ()
>> #11 0x0100a4dc in internal_catch ()
>> #12 0x0105c848 in command_loop ()
>> #13 0x0105c8d3 in recursive_edit_1 ()
>> #14 0x0104c8ce in Frecursive_edit ()
>> #15 0x01002d86 in main ()
>
> This thread (thread 1) is the one we are interested in. But why
> doesn't the backtrace include function arguments? Did you strip some
> of the debugging info or something?
No, this is what gdb outputs. I have no idea why it does not include more info.
>
> What does this show:
>
> (gdb) thread 1
> (gdb) bt 5 full
I tried this one. But still no function arguments.
However this time the debug info is a little different:
(gdb) #0 0x77cccd69 in ntdll!RtlAreAllAccessesGranted ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x77cce275 in ntdll!LdrGetProcedureAddress ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x76726a69 in KERNEL32!FindResourceW ()
from C:\Windows\system32\kernel32.dll
No symbol table info available.
#3 0x22a60001 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#4 0x764ac5f7 in USER32!GetMenuBarInfo () from C:\Windows\system32\user32.dll
No symbol table info available.
(More stack frames follow...)
(gdb) [Switching to thread 2 (Thread 5496.0x17d0)]#0 0x77d10754 in
ntdll!EtwpNotificationThread () from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
(gdb) #0 0x77d10754 in ntdll!EtwpNotificationThread ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x76aed67f in setjmp () from C:\Windows\system32\msvcrt.dll
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x0082ffc4 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) [Switching to thread 3 (Thread 5496.0x1f24)]#0 0x77cf5e74 in
ntdll!LdrAccessResource () from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
(gdb) Invalid character '' in expression.
Here is the output by "thread apply all bt":
Thread 3 (Thread 5496.0x1f24):
#0 0x77cf5e74 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
#1 0x77cf5610 in ntdll!ZwWaitForMultipleObjects32 ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
#2 0x7672a5d7 in WaitForMultipleObjectsEx ()
from C:\Windows\system32\kernel32.dll
#3 0x00000002 in ?? ()
#4 0x2226fef0 in ?? ()
#5 0x7672a6f0 in WaitForMultipleObjects ()
from C:\Windows\system32\kernel32.dll
#6 0x6e2d1883 in msiltcfg!ShutdownMsi ()
from C:\Windows\system32\msiltcfg.dll
#7 0x00000002 in ?? ()
#8 0x2226ff78 in ?? ()
#9 0x7672d0e9 in KERNEL32!AcquireSRWLockExclusive ()
from C:\Windows\system32\kernel32.dll
#10 0x77cd19bb in ntdll!RtlInitializeNtUserPfn ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
#11 0x77cd198e in ntdll!RtlInitializeNtUserPfn ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
#12 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Thread 2 (Thread 5496.0x17d0):
#0 0x77d10754 in ntdll!EtwpNotificationThread ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
#1 0x76aed67f in setjmp () from C:\Windows\system32\msvcrt.dll
#2 0x0082ffc4 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Thread 1 (Thread 5496.0x1b20):
#0 0x77cccd69 in ntdll!RtlAreAllAccessesGranted ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
#1 0x77cce275 in ntdll!LdrGetProcedureAddress ()
from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
#2 0x76726a69 in KERNEL32!FindResourceW ()
from C:\Windows\system32\kernel32.dll
#3 0x22a60001 in ?? ()
#4 0x764ac5f7 in USER32!GetMenuBarInfo () from C:\Windows\system32\user32.dll
#5 0x22a60001 in ?? ()
#6 0x764ac619 in USER32!GetMenuBarInfo () from C:\Windows\system32\user32.dll
#7 0x22a60001 in ?? ()
#8 0x764ac508 in USER32!GetMenuBarInfo () from C:\Windows\system32\user32.dll
#9 0x22a60001 in ?? ()
#10 0x764ac67e in USER32!GetMenuBarInfo () from C:\Windows\system32\user32.dll
#11 0x22a60001 in ?? ()
#12 0x764adaba in USER32!LoadImageA () from C:\Windows\system32\user32.dll
#13 0x7536a13e in DllInstall ()
from
C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.6002.18005_none_5cb72f96088b0de0\comctl32.dll
#14 0x752e223c in DPA_GetPtrIndex ()
from
C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.6002.18005_none_5cb72f96088b0de0\comctl32.dll
#15 0x7531bb28 in DSA_EnumCallback ()
from
C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.6002.18005_none_5cb72f96088b0de0\comctl32.dll
#16 0x752e2fb9 in DPA_GetPtrIndex ()
from
C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.6002.18005_none_5cb72f96088b0de0\comctl32.dll
#17 0x75308540 in DSA_Destroy ()
from
C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.windows.common-controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.6002.18005_none_5cb72f96088b0de0\comctl32.dll
#18 0x764bfd72 in USER32!GetWindowMinimizeRect ()
from C:\Windows\system32\user32.dll
#19 0x000b0d32 in ?? ()
#20 0x00000001 in ?? ()
#21 0x00000000 in ?? ()
>
>> p.s. Is there anyway to print the backtract to a file?
>
> Yes, say "set logging on" before "bt", and then all output will be ion
> the file gdb.txt.
- might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/25
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/25
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/26
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/26
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Andreas Schwab, 2010/04/26
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/27
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/27
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode,
zwz <=
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/04/28
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/29
- Re: might a bug in ido-mode, zwz, 2010/04/27
Re: might a bug in ido-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/04/25