[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Wrestling Match: lisp.h vs rest of the includes
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Wrestling Match: lisp.h vs rest of the includes |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:22:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The problem with these changes is that they represent moving things in
> the opposite direction of what I think would be right: from the
> includes to lisp.h (not that I'm moving anything to lisp.h, just
> keeping the declaration on lisp.h and removing the other one).
Indeed, we generally want to move them to the specific .h that
corresponds to where they're defined. Why did you choose to keep the
lisp.h version rather than the other?
Stefan