[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Wrestling Match: lisp.h vs rest of the includes
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Wrestling Match: lisp.h vs rest of the includes |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:51:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Why did you choose to keep the lisp.h version rather than the other?
> I haven't seen (or haven't noticed) any tendency towards moving things
> out of lisp.h. Otherwise I wouldn't have asked.
Indeed, we haven't made a strong attempt at doing it, but it was decided
a long time ago that we wanted to do that (a bit before I made a bunch
of changes to keymap.c where I took the opportunity to create
a keymap.h and move some of the declarations from lisp.h to this new
file, i.e. late 2001 accoding to "bzr log").
Stefan