[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:36:15 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:51:38 +0100
> From: Uday S Reddy <address@hidden>
> Cc: Uday S Reddy <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> By arguing "both ways", I mean that you want to argue that bound
> branches are better. But, when pushed, the best you can say is that
> they are no worse. Nobody has pointed out anything that makes them
> better.
The only advantage of a bound branch is that the workflow is simpler.
> If you want to work on the main branch and commit it frequently,
> like Eli wants to do for bug fixes, then bound branches are worse
> because they force you to synchronize for each commit.
You cannot push without synchronizing anyway, or else you will mess up
the upstream history.
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, (continued)
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/22
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/22
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/21