[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:39:08 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > If you want to work on the main branch and commit it frequently,
> > like Eli wants to do for bug fixes, then bound branches are worse
> > because they force you to synchronize for each commit.
> You cannot push without synchronizing anyway, or else you will mess
> up the upstream history.
Sure, but as long as you have arranged your local branch so that its
mainline commits all belong on the upstream mainline, you synchronize
once *per push* rather than once *per commit*. Synchronization (done
correctly) is expensive because it involves a build-and-test cycle.
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, (continued)
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/22
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/21
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/21