[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e and pi
From: |
Helmut Eller |
Subject: |
Re: e and pi |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:26:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
* Eli Zaretskii [2010-09-18 11:07] writes:
>> From: Helmut Eller <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:21:02 +0200
>>
>> > What you describe as a big surprise is actually known to every C/C++
>> > programmer: some names are "reserved by the implementation" and should
>> > not be used by the application code.
>>
>> I don't see how that could be relevant here.
>
> It's relevant because such limitations are common in other languages.
No it's not relevant, because languages without dynamic scoping or wich
support namespaces don't have this limitation.
Helmut
- Re: e and pi, (continued)
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi,
Helmut Eller <=
- Re: e and pi, David Kastrup, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/18
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/18