[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:18:13 +0900 |
Christian Ohler <address@hidden> writes:
> : If cl.el is loaded, ERT needs to pass two arguments to
> macroexpand', only one otherwise. The solution is simple, but
> figuring out that this problem exists took me a while.
The normal (non-cl) macroexpand takes the same arguments, so why do
you need to make a distinction?
-Miles
--
((lambda (x) (list x x)) (lambda (x) (list x x)))
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, (continued)
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/10/05
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/06
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Daniel Colascione, 2010/10/07
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/08
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/10/05
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, MON KEY, 2010/10/05
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Christian Ohler, 2010/10/07
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Christian Ohler, 2010/10/07
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/06
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, David Kastrup, 2010/10/06