[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: return

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: return
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:54:39 +0900

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> No, it establishes a named block, so you can say
> Which is kinda annoying, in my opinion.  Especially if you have long
> function names and a lot of return-from forms.  Or you rename function
> names...

Hmm, kinda annoying or not, I think it would be silly to add a
slightly-incompatible form of return to elisp (regardless of whether it
uses a new name or not); it's just confusing, for a very small gain.

If we add this, I think we should just do so compatibly with CL, and
then change cl.el to use the new mechanism.


Accordion, n. An instrument in harmony with the sentiments of an assassin.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]