[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: return
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: return |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:54:39 +0900 |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> No, it establishes a named block, so you can say
..
> Which is kinda annoying, in my opinion. Especially if you have long
> function names and a lot of return-from forms. Or you rename function
> names...
Hmm, kinda annoying or not, I think it would be silly to add a
slightly-incompatible form of return to elisp (regardless of whether it
uses a new name or not); it's just confusing, for a very small gain.
If we add this, I think we should just do so compatibly with CL, and
then change cl.el to use the new mechanism.
-Miles
--
Accordion, n. An instrument in harmony with the sentiments of an assassin.
- return, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/26
- Re: return, Tassilo Horn, 2010/11/26
- Re: return, Miles Bader, 2010/11/26
- Re: return, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/26
- Re: return,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: return, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/26
- Re: return, Tassilo Horn, 2010/11/26
- Re: return, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/26