[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:42:03 +0200

> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:29:43 +0900
> But, as I wrote before, I'm still hesitating over which is
> better; keeping glyphless-char-display separate from display
> table, or integrating that functionality to display table.

What are the pros and cons, which make you hesitate?

> > And another issue: the character group c0-control includes the
> > newline.  So if the display of this group is set to anything at all,
> > the newlines are not displayed as such.  I doubt that users would
> > expect or want that when they customize the display of c0-control.  So
> > maybe we should exempt newline (and perhaps also TAB) from this group;
> > users who really want that can always set glyphless-char-display
> > directly.
> > WDYT?
> I agree on exempting TAB and NL from c0-control group.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]