|
From: | Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: | Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM |
Date: | Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:42:03 +0200 |
> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> > Cc: address@hidden > Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:29:43 +0900 > > But, as I wrote before, I'm still hesitating over which is > better; keeping glyphless-char-display separate from display > table, or integrating that functionality to display table. What are the pros and cons, which make you hesitate? > > And another issue: the character group c0-control includes the > > newline. So if the display of this group is set to anything at all, > > the newlines are not displayed as such. I doubt that users would > > expect or want that when they customize the display of c0-control. So > > maybe we should exempt newline (and perhaps also TAB) from this group; > > users who really want that can always set glyphless-char-display > > directly. > > > WDYT? > > I agree on exempting TAB and NL from c0-control group. Done.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |