[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Return

From: Samuel Bronson
Subject: Re: Return
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:51:48 -0500

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden> wrote:

>  > Probably, in the case of add-on packages, it does not help that the
>  > XEmacs packaging machinery is only intended for use with packages
>  > stored in its own CVS tree...
> That is false.  If somebody wants to use our packaging machinery for
> out of tree packaging, they are certainly welcome to do so.  VM does
> it, for example.  I among others would spend some effort to make that
> easier; I know it's rather awkward at the moment.

Er, I guess I should have made that clearer... I actually meant that
it seems that (more or less) needs to put *something* in the
xemacs-packages tree, and this is (I assume) not particularly fun
without CVS commit access. At least, none of my DVCSes seem to be able
to handle branching from CVS...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]