[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:23:18 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> That may or may not be what he's arguing, but it seems to me the
> question here is "if a key has a familiar 'generic' binding that is
> applicable to and useful in Emacs, *and* Emacs itself doesn't bind
> that key, should Emacs 'use' the generic binding by default?" And the
> answer "yes" follows from the principle of least astonishment.
Thanks. Yes.
> Since Windows has a way of providing a fallback binding for events, it
> seems to me that unless Emacs has a reason *not* to use that fallback,
> such as "Emacs has bound a function to that event" or "in Emacs that
> behavior is stupid/useless/harmful" or "the user says he doesn't like
> it", it should be allowed to fall through to the fallback when the
> Emacs binding is void.
What I really hoped to discuss where the technical difficulties. Emacs
does not currently have a way to let key binding fall back to the OS
binding. I am not sure it is trivial and I have forgotten the details.
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/14
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/14
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/14
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Philipp Haselwarter, 2011/01/16
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Lennart Borgman <=
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/14
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/14
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/14
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/15
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/16
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16