[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exec-path and PATH
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: exec-path and PATH |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:53:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> >> I would even say
>> >> It is searched for in `exec-path' (which see).
>> > Literally? What does the `(which see)' mean?
>> Same thing as "(see exec-path)". A reference to another part of the
>> documentation.
> And so it is entirely redundant, since the "exec-path" will already be
> marked as a link.
It's not entirely redundant, since the `exec-path' just names the
variable and provides a link in case you want to look it up, whereas the
"which see" bit actually encourages the user to follow the link.
Whether the nuance matters, I don't know.
Stefan
- Re: exec-path and PATH, (continued)
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eric Hanchrow, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eric Schulte, 2011/03/21
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Wojciech Meyer, 2011/03/20
Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/19
Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
Re: exec-path and PATH, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/19