[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exec-path and PATH
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: exec-path and PATH |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:36:58 +0200 |
> From: Christoph Scholtes <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:45:50 -0600
>
> However, now I wonder why we have a facility like exec-path at
> all. Wouldn't the process-environment's PATH be enough?
Because working with a list is much easier than with a single string?
- exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/18
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eric Hanchrow, 2011/03/20
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Eric Schulte, 2011/03/21
- Re: exec-path and PATH, Wojciech Meyer, 2011/03/20
Re: exec-path and PATH, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/03/19
Re: exec-path and PATH, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
Re: exec-path and PATH, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/19