[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Buffers relative order
From: |
Angelo Graziosi |
Subject: |
Buffers relative order |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:16:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
With recent changes in trunk, it seems that buffers relative order is
different between sessions (desktop save on).
Suppose I start Emacs without any desktop file, and visit some buffer:
C-x C-f A
C-x C-f B
C-x C-f C
C-x C-f D
So D is what I see in the frame. Now suppose I click mouse-1 (previous
buffer) on the buffer name in status bar. I get:
mouse-1 --> C
mouse-1 --> B
mouse-1 --> A
mouse-1 --> Scratch
mouse-1 --> Messages
mouse-1 --> D
Still D in the frame...
A B C D
<---- previous
If now I save desktop and exit, when restart Emacs I find
D
mouse-1 --> A
mouse-1 --> B
mouse-1 --> C
mouse-1 --> Scratch
mouse-1 --> Messages
mouse-1 --> D
C B A D
<---- previous
This is a different (cyclic) sequence. If one exits Emacs from Scratch
or Messages or from another buffer, one gets a permutation of ABCD, say
DBAC...
Now, usually I want to preserve the relative order of buffers I am
working on, mainly because they are "linked" with some logic (.c,.cxx,.h
project 1; .f90 proj. 2; .sh proj. 3 etc.)
With this new behavior, after a few start/exit Emacs, it is difficult to
work, the order is lost (header files are "far" from .c/.cxx etc.)
Is this a something with which we will have to do in Emacs24?
Ciao,
Angelo.
- Buffers relative order,
Angelo Graziosi <=
- Re: Buffers relative order, martin rudalics, 2011/06/21
- Re: Buffers relative order, Angelo Graziosi, 2011/06/21
- Re: Buffers relative order, martin rudalics, 2011/06/22
- Re: Buffers relative order, Angelo Graziosi, 2011/06/22
- Re: Buffers relative order, martin rudalics, 2011/06/23
- Re: Buffers relative order, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/25
- Re: Buffers relative order, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- Re: Buffers relative order, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/26
- Re: Buffers relative order, martin rudalics, 2011/06/27