[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr:// |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:44:14 -0400 |
> From: Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:53:23 +0200
>
> > bzr branch nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
>
> bzr branch nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
> 678.70s user 7.29s system 54% cpu 21:04.38 total
>
> > bzr branch bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
>
> bzr branch bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/
> 543.03s user 7.29s system 65% cpu 13:57.98 total
>
> So your observation of the smart server actually being faster seems to
> be true. I use the bzr client version 2.4.1.
Thanks.
- bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/10
- Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://, Frank Schmitt, 2011/10/10
- Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://, Ari Roponen, 2011/10/10
- Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://, Sven Joachim, 2011/10/10
- Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://, Tassilo Horn, 2011/10/10
- Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bzr:// vz nosmart+bzr://, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/10/10