[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CL package serious deficiencies

From: Nix
Subject: Re: CL package serious deficiencies
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:10:29 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux)

On 7 Feb 2012, Glenn Morris uttered the following:

> Nix wrote:
>> Well, if you find out what the problems are, I'll see about fixing them.
> You could look at
> if you want something to do (send any follow-ups to the relevant bug
> address, not here).

Thanks! on the list...

>                                              Also none of these have any
> relevance to whether cl is acceptable to use at run-time.

So... unreliability is *not* the reason, after all? And documentation-
weightiness, as Tom points out, cannot be the reason. So... what *is*
the reason? I (and others, it seems) are distinctly curious.

NULL && (void)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]