[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Windows 64 port

From: Fabrice Popineau
Subject: Re: Windows 64 port
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:27:12 +0100

The situation with the INT_RANGE_OVERFLOW check is similar, except
there the macro is more like this:

 #define a 2147483647
 #define b 1
 #define FOO (INT_ADD_OVERFLOW (a,b) ? INT_MAX : (a)+(b))
 int i = FOO;

Again, any compiler that warns about potential overflow of
2147483647+1 should be ignored, because the _expression_
2147483647+1 cannot possibly be evaluated.

Ok. I read the intprops.h file and I agree with this example. 
Pity there is no other (simpler) way to handle this.

Thanks for the explanations.


Fabrice Popineau
Département Informatique
3, rue Joliot Curie
91192 Gif/Yvette Cedex
Tel direct : +33 (0) 169851950
Standard : +33 (0) 169851212

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]