[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*'
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*' |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:15:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Drew. Just keep using (require 'cl) for code that needs to run in
Emacs<24.3 and move on. Yes, I hope to remove cl.el at the some point.
Sadly, I know this time is not anywhere close.
As for "new stuff more compatible with CL but using the wrong name",
I do not know what you're referring to (you're using cl-loop as an
example, but loop is now an alias for cl-loop, so that can't be it), so
just be concrete (but brief) and maybe I can explain it.
Stefan
- policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/25
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*',
Stefan Monnier <=
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Michael Welsh Duggan, 2012/09/27
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/27
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Michael Welsh Duggan, 2012/09/29