[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*' |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:01:15 +0200 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:31:17 -0700
>
> I would expect to see a clear explanation, with recommendations, of migration
> and multiple-version support - in NEWS, preferably. That is normal for What's
> New, README, or Release Changes documents for software.
>
> For example, if I currently have (loop...), what do you recommend? Replace it
> by this?
>
> (if (fboundp 'cl-loop) (cl-loop...) (loop...))
>
> And likewise for all the rest.
>
> (Yes, I know that this is only a deprecation now, and not yet desupport. I
> would nevertheless like to know what you recommend for supporting multiple
> Emacs
> versions.)
I think, as long as you need to support versions of Emacs without
cl-lib, just leave the code as it was, i.e. use 'loop' in the above
example.
- policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*',
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/25
- RE: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Drew Adams, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/25
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Bastien, 2012/09/26
- Re: policy, recommendations regarding `cl-*', Michael Welsh Duggan, 2012/09/27