[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:50:51 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:48:27 +0100
> From: Dani Moncayo <address@hidden>
> Cc: Christoph Scholtes <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:28:12 -0600
> >> From: Christoph Scholtes <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> The purpose of the Emacs Windows barebin distribution has been
> >> questioned a couple of times. Does it still make sense to build it or
> >> can we save the time and server space?
> >
> > I suggest to omit it the next time you produce binaries and see if
> > anyone complains.
>
> AFAIK, nobody complained, and if nobody cares about that "barebin"
> distribution, why spend time making it?
>
> So please could we apply the attached patch?
Fine with me.
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Dani Moncayo, 2012/11/16
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Mathias Dahl, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
- RE: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Drew Adams, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
- RE: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Drew Adams, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
- RE: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Drew Adams, 2012/11/18