[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:42:12 -0400 |
On 26 March 2013 15:38, John Wiegley <address@hidden> wrote:
> My main reason for bringing this up again is that Bazaar development has
> effectively stalled. There are major bugs which have been in their
> bug-tracker for years now -- bugs affecting Emacs development, such as the
> ELPA repository -- whach have been ignored all this time.
Let us also note that the ELPA repository is now in git due to this,
so part of Emacs development is already de jure in git, and lots of
other development is de facto done on git.
I still think git is a horrible DVCS, but at least it's maintained, unlike bzr.
- Jordi G. H.
- On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/26
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/03/26
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Thierry Volpiatto, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Allen S. Rout, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27