|
From: | Daniel Colascione |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] Macros expansion changes, robust symbol macros, and constant propagation |
Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:37:01 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
On 9/17/13 4:43 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: >>> +(defun byte-optimize-do-constant-propagation (let-form) By the way: why do we have byte-optimize forms _and_ compiler macros? I understand that compiler macros come from cl and the byte-optimize stuff is much older, but why separate them these days? byte-optimize forms look and work like compiler macros, so why aren't they compiler macros?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |