Re: Trunk still not open

[David Kastrup]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:02:53 +0100
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> >> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
>> >> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:35:41 +0100
>> >> 
>> >> Well, one could push them to an "undocumented" branch.  That one gets
>> >> rebased from time to time on the trunk, so any commit from there that
>> >> has made it with documentation into the trunk will no longer be in there
>> >> after rebasing.
>> >
>> > This could also work, but IMO this alternative is more complicated
>> > than the other one, and also has the disadvantage that changes appear
>> > on the trunk with delay, which some users might not like.
>> 
>> Well, that's the point.  A state that isn't an annoyance to anybody is
>> not likely to change.
>
> Annoyance might also lead to unwanted consequences, like rebellion.

I rebel against generic platitudes.

-- 
David Kastrup