[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: History for query replace pairs
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: History for query replace pairs |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2014 01:12:17 +0000 |
> > If this line is followed, I'd recommend rebinding one of the transpose
> > commands (transpose-lines, perhaps) to swap the TO and FROM. Having to
> > manually kill and yank would be a very cumbersome way of reversing the
> > replacement.
>
> Good idea. However, `transpose-lines' doesn't seem to fit semantically.
> But perhaps you proposed it because other transpose-* commands might be
> useful in the query-replace minibuffer inside the FROM or TO part.
Yes, I figured transpose-lines is the least useful of the transpose commands when it comes to query-replace input. But transpose sexps is probably almost as useless and might feel more intuitive.
- RE: History for query replace pairs, (continued)
- RE: History for query replace pairs, Drew Adams, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Alan Mackenzie, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Alan Mackenzie, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/21
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/21
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/22
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Artur Malabarba, 2014/10/23
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/26
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/26