[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Referring to revisions in the git future.

From: Barry Warsaw
Subject: Re: Referring to revisions in the git future.
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:12:16 -0400

On Oct 29, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

>David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Barry Warsaw <address@hidden> writes:
>> > [*] Although it's true that some bzr merge operations can "mess with"
>> > those numbers, it's generally bad practice to use merge in such a way
>> > as to cause this to happen.
>> My asking-for-trouble meter just rang off the hook.
>*shudder* And rightly so!

Sure, but it's rare and only happens with some funky (and I'd argue incorrect
directionally) merges.  And besides, those sequential numbers are only for our
convenience, right? ;)  Revision ids of course are inviolate.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]