[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist
From: |
Tjernlund |
Subject: |
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:04:25 +0100 |
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 19:53 +0200, martin rudalics wrote:
> > Try my example:
> > Nothing gets me:
> > White background, Black text
> >
> > Only (setq default-frame-alist '((background-color . "#333333")
> > (foreground-color . "White") (cursor-color . "White"))) gets
> > White background, White text
> >
> > Both:
> > Green background, White text
> >
> > I find it asymmetric that with only default-frame-alist changes foreground,
> > but not background nor cursor
>
> Which platform, which build?
Sorry for late reply, been travelling.
This is on Gentoo GNU Linux, both emacs 24.3 and 24.4
Jocke
- default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/23
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, martin rudalics, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist,
Tjernlund <=
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24