[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Generalizing find-definition

From: Jorgen Schaefer
Subject: Re: Generalizing find-definition
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:58:57 +0100

On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:13:45 +0100
Helmut Eller <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 03 2014, Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
> >> I have my own hack for this; It requires me to distinguish between
> >> variable and defun names and invoke separate keys; I hope you can
> >> remove that annoyance.
> >
> > I'm not sure how I can remove that annoyance - is that not
> > language-dependent?  What kind of functionality would you require
> > there? 
> One way to solve this is to merge the list of candidates for functions
> and variables.  At least that's what we do in SLIME.  In elisp-mode
> M-. could combine the candidates of find-function and find-variable.
> Most of the time the merged list would only contain a single
> candidate.

Why would the proposed find-definition interface make a distinction
between variables and functions at all? So far, there has been none

Does that mean that this is not an issue? That'd be great :-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]