[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: sequence manipulation functions
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: sequence manipulation functions |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:29:14 -0800 (PST) |
> I see "cl-lib" as a compatibility package with Common Lisp, not a
> base library of the language. My goal is not to remove or replace
> "cl-lib", but to add core sequence functions to Elisp.
What does that even mean? Is dired.el core? Is subr.el? simple.el?
If what you mean is something that is loaded automatically, from
the outset, then the question is simple: If such functions should
be available from the outset then load them from the outset (i.e.,
add them to the "core").
What I think we do not need is to proliferate additional functions
that do pretty much the same thing. We don't need different levels
of a function that performs a "reduce" operation, one "in the core"
and another in a library not loaded by default.
Seems like a no-brainer, to me. (Just one opinion.)
- Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions, (continued)
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Damien Cassou, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Nicolas Petton, 2014/11/05
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Tom Tromey, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions, Drew Adams, 2014/11/05
RE: sequence manipulation functions,
Drew Adams <=
Re: sequence manipulation functions, Richard Stallman, 2014/11/05