Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions

[Leo Liu]

On 2014-11-13 13:21 +0800, Drew Adams wrote:
> It should be based on the existing sequence functions in Common Lisp,
> as stated earlier.  Such things were worked out for Lisp eons ago.
> There is really no reason to do something very different, other
> things being equal.

I think most people will like this option. So I was hypothesising what
was being done i.e. `If we were to model another set of list/seq
routines after other......' since we already have one after CL.

Leo