Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal

[Oleh]

Hi Andreas,

>> Note that it only takes the "#([^\"]" spot. The "#c" convention is
>> completely untouched, unless "c" is "(".
>
> IMHO this is too close to the syntax for propertized strings.

This can also be seen as an advantage, this already is part of Emacs

    (read "#(\"foo\")")

All I'm doing is saying: if the first char of the string syntax isn't
", make it a
reader syntax for `short-lambda'.

Thus this reader syntax doesn't really tread other reader syntaxes.