[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:57:16 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
On 01/22/2015 01:52 AM, Oleh wrote:
>> Speaking of things that ship with Emacs: have you tried
>> prettify-symbols-mode?
>>
>
> No need, I've had it for years with the approach that I describe here:
> http://oremacs.com/2015/01/11/pretty-elisp-regex/
Sure. My point is that existence of prettify-symbols-mode and equivalent
is another argument against the creation of a shorter-than-lambda
function literal syntax.
(By the way: the idea of a mode that hides backslashes in string
literals scares me. I'd much rather just use rx.)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, (continued)
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, René Kyllingstad, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Ivan Andrus, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Leo Liu, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/01/24
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22