[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r.

From: Drew Adams
Subject: RE: Rationalising c[ad]\{2,5\}r.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:01:15 -0700 (PDT)

> > >> and there will be compatibility aliases for cl-caaadr etc..
> > > Why? Why is that needed?
> > To not make it harder for developers to support Emacs 24.X
> Well, if you mean keeping `caaadr', then yes.  It's `cl-caaadr'
> that has no raison d'etre.  Keep `caaadr'; toss `cl-caaadr'.

Has, `caaadr' always existed (since 24.1) without explicitly `require'ing the `cl' package?

Yes. Just require `cl-macs.el'. Or require `cl.el' at byte-compile time.
These are macros.

If the answer is yes, then I'm fine with removing the prefixed alias.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]