[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:48:53 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:02:49 -0400
> Cc: Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> > overlays. Setting inhibit-point-motion-hooks helped, but it occurs to me
> > that the operation shouldn't have been expensive in the first place.
>
> goto-char should never trigger any hook. Properties such as
> `intangible' are misfeatures, IMO.
Does that include 'point-entered' and 'point-exited' as well? If so,
can you explain why they are misfeatures?
- Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/15
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Lennart Borgman, 2015/03/16