[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:03:11 -0300 |
On Mar 16, 2015 4:24 PM, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:49:02 -0400
> > Cc: Emacs developers <address@hidden>
> >
> > > So you propose effectively making inhibit-point-motion-hooks default to
> > > t? Why not just do precisely that?
> >
> > Because IIRC inhibit-point-motion-hooks also inhibits cursor-motion
> > hooks
>
> Now I'm confused: there's no cursor-motion in Emacs, only
> point-motion. But you already know that, so I don't understand what
> are you alluding to here.
IIUC, the argument is that these hooks should happen between commands, not in the middle of elisp code at every goto-char.
- Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/15
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/15
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/03/16
- Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/03/16